<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rational Mastermind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshoakes.com/rational-mastermind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshoakes.com/rational-mastermind/</link>
	<description>constructive cynicism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:05:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://joshoakes.com/rational-mastermind/comment-page-1/#comment-975</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshoakes.com/?p=93#comment-975</guid>
		<description>@skylana: but not surprising, yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@skylana: but not surprising, yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skylana</title>
		<link>http://joshoakes.com/rational-mastermind/comment-page-1/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>skylana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshoakes.com/?p=93#comment-948</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m you only E. the field marshall. interesant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m you only E. the field marshall. interesant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://joshoakes.com/rational-mastermind/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 08:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshoakes.com/?p=93#comment-184</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind the closed-loop novelization of philosophic ideals so much, since one of the best ways to teach someone something is to couch it in a story. They can take it or leave it, but at least they weren&#039;t bored.
But when it&#039;s as heavy-handed as Rand, it&#039;s unpalatable. I can only handle so many comparisons between the chiseled, charismatic, work-a-holic protagonist and his buffoonish, lazy, stupid, idiotic family. She might as well have just hollowed out a little hole in &lt;i&gt;Atlas Shrugged&lt;/i&gt; and stuck a hammer in it a la &lt;i&gt;Shawshank Redemption&lt;/i&gt; (retroactive spoiler alert) with the words &quot;rational self-interest&quot; carved on the handle. The dust jacket would read: &quot;Flip open the book, pull out the hammer, aim it at your forehead, and pound away. 
* * *
And instead of thinking as Gandalf as a test-taker, I prefer to think of him as a proctor ... you know, handing out SATs to nervous high schoolers and intoning, &quot;You shall not pass!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind the closed-loop novelization of philosophic ideals so much, since one of the best ways to teach someone something is to couch it in a story. They can take it or leave it, but at least they weren&#8217;t bored.<br />
But when it&#8217;s as heavy-handed as Rand, it&#8217;s unpalatable. I can only handle so many comparisons between the chiseled, charismatic, work-a-holic protagonist and his buffoonish, lazy, stupid, idiotic family. She might as well have just hollowed out a little hole in <i>Atlas Shrugged</i> and stuck a hammer in it a la <i>Shawshank Redemption</i> (retroactive spoiler alert) with the words &#8220;rational self-interest&#8221; carved on the handle. The dust jacket would read: &#8220;Flip open the book, pull out the hammer, aim it at your forehead, and pound away.<br />
* * *<br />
And instead of thinking as Gandalf as a test-taker, I prefer to think of him as a proctor &#8230; you know, handing out SATs to nervous high schoolers and intoning, &#8220;You shall not pass!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://joshoakes.com/rational-mastermind/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 05:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshoakes.com/?p=93#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Also, I think when Gandalf took the M-B test, he might have been feeding biased answers to score an INTJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I think when Gandalf took the M-B test, he might have been feeding biased answers to score an INTJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://joshoakes.com/rational-mastermind/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshoakes.com/?p=93#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Results do tend to fluctuate if you are near the middle of the scale when taking the &quot;informal&quot; tests.  Many tests just dump you into a group when the formalized tests place you on a scale for each characteristic pair.

Regarding lucas, I don&#039;t know if I think that means I am capable of great things, or if it means I have already done my life&#039;s best work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Results do tend to fluctuate if you are near the middle of the scale when taking the &#8220;informal&#8221; tests.  Many tests just dump you into a group when the formalized tests place you on a scale for each characteristic pair.</p>
<p>Regarding lucas, I don&#8217;t know if I think that means I am capable of great things, or if it means I have already done my life&#8217;s best work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://joshoakes.com/rational-mastermind/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshoakes.com/?p=93#comment-174</guid>
		<description>I made it through The Fountainhead, but I seem to remember it making me a little queasy.  The emotionless, egocentric main character is set up as a paragon of individualism, the selfish genius standing alone against the attacks of the common rabble.  So incredibly elitist...and not that great a writer, so double bleh.

Rand&#039;s bad, but how do you feel about being on a list with Lucas?  That&#039;s got to cause some mixed feelings.

The last time or two that I&#039;ve taken these tests, the outcome has changed, but that&#039;s not too weird since I tend to be in the middle for most categories.  Maybe it&#039;s time to take another one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made it through The Fountainhead, but I seem to remember it making me a little queasy.  The emotionless, egocentric main character is set up as a paragon of individualism, the selfish genius standing alone against the attacks of the common rabble.  So incredibly elitist&#8230;and not that great a writer, so double bleh.</p>
<p>Rand&#8217;s bad, but how do you feel about being on a list with Lucas?  That&#8217;s got to cause some mixed feelings.</p>
<p>The last time or two that I&#8217;ve taken these tests, the outcome has changed, but that&#8217;s not too weird since I tend to be in the middle for most categories.  Maybe it&#8217;s time to take another one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://joshoakes.com/rational-mastermind/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshoakes.com/?p=93#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Rand isn&#039;t a fantastic writer. I never got further into Atlas than to open at random and skim a few passages (this is how I decide if I want to read something).

For one thing, I don&#039;t buy into writing a work of fiction in order to &quot;prove&quot; the validity of your philosophical ideal. Talk about a closed loop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Rand isn&#8217;t a fantastic writer. I never got further into Atlas than to open at random and skim a few passages (this is how I decide if I want to read something).</p>
<p>For one thing, I don&#8217;t buy into writing a work of fiction in order to &#8220;prove&#8221; the validity of your philosophical ideal. Talk about a closed loop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://joshoakes.com/rational-mastermind/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshoakes.com/?p=93#comment-172</guid>
		<description>I had a friend who, when asked about M-B, always said that he was an IDGF. I suppose I&#039;m an IDGS.
As for you, you&#039;re in good company with Gandalf, Moriarty, and Lewis, but Ayn Rand? Bleh. I tried reading &lt;i&gt;Atlas Shrugged&lt;/i&gt; twice and ending up choking on Objectivism both times. I mean, I can get behind a solid work ethic, but the woman couldn&#039;t allow even one femtogram of grace into her life. Also, as a writer, she was really into telling, not showing. Bleh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a friend who, when asked about M-B, always said that he was an IDGF. I suppose I&#8217;m an IDGS.<br />
As for you, you&#8217;re in good company with Gandalf, Moriarty, and Lewis, but Ayn Rand? Bleh. I tried reading <i>Atlas Shrugged</i> twice and ending up choking on Objectivism both times. I mean, I can get behind a solid work ethic, but the woman couldn&#8217;t allow even one femtogram of grace into her life. Also, as a writer, she was really into telling, not showing. Bleh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
